| . |
|
Gasoline Digest
What you need to
know about fuel for Corvettes and other high-performance cars.
by Hib Halverson
©2004 all rights reserved
No use without permission |
 |
|
Image:
Frank Hough |
|
You’re leaning
against your Corvette, holding the gas nozzle lever open, watching the counters
flash. Sound familiar? Beyond reading the price and the octane on the pump, ever
wonder about what goes into your Vette’s tank? If you have; read on. We’re going
to cover some high-profile, gasoline issues of interest to Corvette enthusiasts.
Gasoline is a mix
of volatile, flammable, liquid hydrocarbons. “Volatile” means it readily
evaporates. “Flammable” means its vapor is combustible. “Hydrocarbons” are
compounds of hydrogen and carbon. When hydrocarbons are burned in an engine,
expanding gases apply force to its pistons and that’s what makes your car go.
Many hydrocarbons
are in crude oil. To extract the specific hydrocarbons that make gasoline,
“crude” is processed or “refined” by one or a combination of: “distillation”,
“cracking,” or “polymerization”. The first boils crude in a vacuum to separate
it into various factions, of which gasoline is one. The other two chemically
modify hydrocarbons to give them desired properties.
Research for this
article led The Idaho Corvette Page to Tim Wusz, an engineer at Rockett
Brand Racing Fuel. Wusz has worked for Rockett and its predecessors, 76
Performance Products Division of Conoco/Phillips, Tosco Corporation, Unocal, and
Union Oil Company since 1965, spending much of that time developing racing
gasolines. Wusz is a former drag racer, a long-time musclecar nut and a former
Corvette ZR-1 owner. |
|
The Basics of Blending
“A ‘barrel’ of crude oil,”
Tim
told us, “is 42 gallons and about 50% ends up as gasoline.
After refining, we’re left with gasoline ‘components’ or ‘blend
stocks,’ segregated in tanks connected to a ‘blend header’
containing computer-controlled valves which meter flow from each
tank. Gasoline is mixed in this blend header then subjected to
quality control such as ‘on-line’ octane testing and sampling
for chemical analysis.
“During blending, we select various hydrocarbons, depending what
we want from the gasoline. For example, with gas for street
applications, warm-up is critical. If the engine hesitates or
dies during warm-up, exhaust emissions and customer satisfaction
are impacted. For racing applications, we’re more concerned with
octane quality and resistance to vapor lock.”
|
|
 |
|
A
typical oil refinery, south of Los Angeles, in
Wilmington, California. This facility is a major source
of gasoline for southern California. The tall tubular
structures are distillation and cracking towers.
Image: author. |
|
To burn in
an engine’s cylinders, gasoline must vaporize. “Volatility” describes
gasoline’s tendency to vaporize. Pump gas is blended for slightly more
volatility and better warm-up. Gasoline blends are changed seasonally to
give consistent drivability. In cold weather, volatility is increased
and in warm weather, it’s reduced. Racing gas typically has less
volatility to resist vapor lock.
You might
think Corvettes stored during winter shouldn’t have full tanks because
of vapor-lock problems when using “winter” gas the following summer. Tim
Wusz told us that with '74 and earlier Corvettes lacking rubber bladders
in their fuel tanks, moisture in an empty tank is a bigger problem than
vapor-lock and he recommends storage with a full tank. Once spring
arrives, it won’t take long to dilute the winter gas with summer gas.
We asked
Tim about “shelf life.” “Gasoline is designed for cradle-to-grave of
about six weeks. In normal use, it is seldom stored for longer than
that, however, it has enough stability so storage for a year is not a
problem.”
|
 |
|
Engineer, Tim Wusz, at work in the Rockett Brand’s
gasoline quality lab. Most racing gasolines get
additional quality control verification steps over
what’s done at a refinery. In the case of Rockett, these
steps are performed by Wusz at the Rockett’s facility in
Yorba Linda, California. Image: author. |
|
You’d
think the challenge in blending gasolines would be quality control
but, according to Tim Wusz, “The biggest problem is meeting
government requirements for volatility, octane, oxygen content,
distillation curve and other things. I don’t know if any one
requirement is more difficult but the combination makes the blending
engineer’s job challenging.
“California has its own requirements and is the only state that
does. The rest of the country comes under slightly less restrictive,
Federal requirements. At one time, we felt handicapped by
California’s requirements, but now, gasoline for California is
better performance-wise than gas sold in any other part of the
country.
“This benefit carries to unleaded racing gasolines sold for street
use, too. Rockett Brand 100 is refined to California specifications
and is capable of slightly better performance than if it was refined
to Federal specifications.” |
Additives, other than gasoline components, are blended in for
special purposes. Typical additives are: anti-oxidants and metal
deactivators (both inhibit gum formation and improve stability),
deposit modifiers (reduce deposits, spark-plug fouling and
pre-ignition), surfactants (prevent icing, improve vaporization,
inhibit deposits and reduce certain emissions), freezing point
depressants, corrosion inhibitors and dyes (for safety or regulatory
purposes). Additives are used in very small amounts, usually 50-100
pounds per thousand barrels of gasoline.
Oxygenates
in RFG
A major
difference between many pump gases and most racing gas are
oxygen-bearing chemical compounds, or oxygenates. “Two oxygenates are
used.” Tim Wusz told us, “One is MTBE–Methyl
Tertiary-Butyl Ether–and the other is ethanol. MTBE is an ether compound
and ethanol is an alcohol. Both were originally blended into gasoline to
increase octane but later found to reduce exhaust emissions. Both have
oxygen in their molecules and reduce emissions by enabling more
efficient combustion.”
The Clean
Air Act of 1990 mandated oxygenated gasoline and its newer, more complex
sibling, reformulated gasoline (RFG), in parts of the country with air
quality problems. The intent was hydrocarbon and carbon monoxide
emissions reductions beyond those possible by ’80s emissions controls
alone. Widespread distribution of gas oxygenated with MTBE began in the
early-90s but, in the late-‘90s, after MTBE’s classification as a
“possible human carcinogen” and being documented as a ground water
pollutant, public opinion built to eliminate it.
By the
mid-’90s, improvements in combustion chamber design, emissions control
hardware and engine controls software accomplished significant HC and CO
reduction, in spite of RFG. With the amount of pre-mid-90s vehicles on
the road decreasing, RFGs are becoming a solution looking for a problem.
That and political pressure has, in most states, made MTBE a piece of
history. California outlawed it on Jan. 1, 2004. A dozen other states
have also outlawed it since then and the rest of the state will follow
in 2005.
Enviromentalists never give up, so ethanol has become the new mainstream
oxygenate and it’s here to stay. California requires at least 5.8%
ethanol in pump gas. Other states may differ but, generally, ethanol
content varies from 6-to-8 percent and goes as high as 10%. While cars
built in the last 5-7 years don’t require oxygenates to achieve low
emissions, ignorance or disbelief of that by environmental activists
along with resistance to ethanol’s elimination by its producers and that
it’s the oxygenate-of-choice for RFG in areas where MTBE has been be
banned make its presence in gasoline inevitible and permanent.
A downside
of RFG can be overly-lean air-fuel ratio when burned in 1970s Corvettes
with stock carburetors having lean calibration to reduce emissions.
Performance and drivability may be compromised by existing calibration
combined with additional leaning due to RFG. The solution is to slightly
richen the calibration. Engines built before the late-’60s often ran
slightly rich and have little problem using oxygenated fuels.
Two
additional caveats apply to ethanol RFG in some older vehicles. It may
release scale from the walls of old fuel tanks. The solution is either
frequent replacement of fuel filters while the scale is going through
the system or a new tank. Ethanol is incompatible with some types of
fuel hose. If hoses date to before 1985, replace existing hose with
modern products, all of which are compatible with RFG.
What’s
Up with Octane
In the
combustion chamber, after the spark plug lights the air-fuel charge, a
“flame front” burns away from the plug. This burning needs to be
controlled if the engine is going to perform well and last a long time.
“Detonation” is rapid, uncontrolled combustion. It occurs after
ignition, when the unburned charge ahead of the expanding flame front is
compressed to the point of auto-ignition. If a significant amount of
unburned charge auto-ignites, detonation will be audible and will
generate intense pressure waves which cause the chamber walls to
vibrate. You hear that as a knocking or pinging sound. This pressure
builds quickly, before the piston reaches top dead center. When
downward force builds before the piston changes direction, stress on it
and other parts is significant as is the performance loss. Detonation
also sends combustion temperatures soaring. The stress and temperature
make even moderate detonation problems capable of damaging the engine in
your Corvette.
“Octane”
or “antiknock rating” is a measure of a gasoline’s resistance to
detonation. Two ratings are common: “research octane number” (RON) and
“motor octane number” (MON). Tests for both use a single-cylinder engine
having a variable compression ratio. The engine is run on a gasoline to
be rated and the compression ratio is varied to obtain a standard knock
intensity measured by an electronic knockmeter. The octane of the sample
is determined by comparing its knock tendency with that of reference
fuels having known octane numbers.
The MON
test, because of faster engine speed, higher mixture temperature and
variable spark timing, better simulates conditions in an automotive
engine and is, Tim Wusz told us, “... more relevant to the enthusiast
trying to understand gasoline. In a real world engine, MON is necessary
at wide-open throttle. It is an important number for high-performance
engines since they spend a high percentage of their lives running at
high speed under high-load.”
The Federal
Government requires octane of gas sold for road use be rated by an
average of RON and MON (“R+M/2”) and that number must be on a yellow
sticker applied to the gas pump. In many places, regular unleaded is
87-octane, mid-grade is 89 and premium varies from 91 to 93 octane. In
high-altitude areas, you’ll find lower octane gas. “Pressure and
temperature in the combustion chamber are less at altitude.” Wusz
stated. “Engines needs less octane so Government allows lower
octane fuel in counties having a large majority of their territory above
4000 feet.”
Will
high-altitude gasoline damage an engine requiring a higher octane? Not
if you stay in the high country or, if you drop below 4000 feet, you
don’t run the engine hard until the high altitude gas is used or diluted
with “sea level” gas.
Do refiners
save money selling lower octane fuel in mountain areas? Nope. They loose
any savings in transportation costs. Most refineries are near coastal
areas so most gasoline is transported to interior states. The farther
it’s moved, the more expensive it becomes.
So...how
much octane do you need?
Only enough
to keep your Corvette’s engine out of detonation. More than that offers
no performance advantage. How do you determine an engine’s
detonation threshold? By testing and the first test instrument is your
ear. If you hear detonation at wide-open throttle, you have a problem.
If there’s no engine-related trouble (ie: too much spark advance, lean
mixture, etc.) causing the detonation, then you need more octane.
Plug
reading can also identify a detonation problem. If you see tiny flecks
of aluminum on the plugs, that’s evidence of detonation. Severe
detonation may melt electrodes and/or crack the center insulators.
All 1982 or
later Corvettes, have feedback control of spark advance and will be
equipped with a knock sensor (KS). If the KS “hears” detonation, the
engine computer’s software retards the spark enough to stop the
detonation. The ’82 or later cars offer access to the computer’s serial
data stream for diagnostic purposes. You can use a “scan tester” (either
software-based, such as “Diacom”, or a dedicated piece of hardware, such
as the Vetronix TECH 1A, TECH 2 or Mastertech) to view the KS signal
and/or the spark retard value. If you can read either of those on a road
test and you see detonation with the tester and know there’s no
engine-related trouble causing it; then you need higher octane gas.
Get the
Lead Out.
The octane
and valve-seat-durability enhancing qualities of alkyl-lead compounds
(chiefly tetraethyl lead, aka: “TEL” or just “lead”) were discovered in
1922 by General Motors. By the late-’20s, “leaded” gas became available
and, by the early ’50s, TEL was in virtually all gas sold in the U.S. By
the late-’60s, “super premiums” averaged 3.5-grams TEL per gallon and
were around 100 RON. While TEL was a cheap way to improve engine
performance and durability, it is toxic, both unburned and in
lead-oxide-particulate form in exhaust gases.
In the late
1960s, concerned with environmental effects of TEL, the Federal
Government legislated its phase-out. Gasoline retailers had to make
unleaded gas available by July, 1974. Following that, stepped limits on
alkyl-lead (“low-leads” of the ’70s and ’80s) were enacted starting with
1.7 grams per gallon in 1975 and dropping to 0.1 g/gal. in 1986. To meet
emissions regulations for model year 1975 (MY75) some manufacturers
added exhaust system catalytic reactors to their vehicles and GM did
that with Corvette. By MY80, all light duty vehicles had them. Also
known as, “catalytic converters”, “catalysts” or just “cats”, these
reactors convert pollutants to non-polluting substances. This ability is
destroyed by alkyl-lead so any catalyst-equipped vehicle had to use
unleaded gas. As a result, leaded gas use peaked in 1977, then declined
significantly. In December, 1995, use of gasoline with more than
0.05-gram alkyl-lead per gallon (in a practical sense, all leaded
gas) by any on-highway vehicle built after MY75 was outlawed.
Lead’s
phase-out forced octane reductions. While it didn’t cause detonation in
new Corvette engines, because, starting in MY71, GM had already lowered
compression ratios as a technical answer to government’s restriction of
oxides of nitrogen (NOx) emissions; it did cause detonation in ’50’s and
’60’s high compression engines. The phase-out, also, eliminated
alkyl-lead’s valve seat protection, forcing an industry-wide, cylinder
head manufacturing process revision: the addition of induction-hardened
seats to the cast iron heads common back then. Aluminum heads have no
problem because they use hard, steel valve seat “inserts.”
|

|
|
Red Line’s Lead Substitute is the ideal solution for engines
that don’t need octane any higher than that of pump gas but
do need the valve seat protection once available with leaded
fuel. Red Line’s other gasoline-related product, Complete
Fuel System Cleaner, is a solvent-based fuel injector and
fuel system cleaner that is one of the most effective
products of that type on the market.
Images: Red Line Oil. |
|

|
|
By the
mid-’80s, car companies learned to better control emissions and
refiners developed higher octane unleaded, so compression ratios
began to climb, again. These modern unleadeds are blended with
aromatic hydrocarbons, which raised their antiknock rating. To a
lesser extent, the addition of oxygenates also increased octane.
If an
engine using unleaded gas has heads lacking induction-hardened seats
or hard seat inserts, “valve seat recession” may occur. Metallic
oxides resulting from lead’s combustion leave a protective coating
on valves and seats. Without that coating, when valve temperatures
are high, during severe duty or extended operation with lean
mixture, microwelding transfers softer seat metal to the valve face
causing the seat to recede into the head. Wear debris cause
additional damage to valve stems and guides. Exhaust valve rotators,
used in some engines, accelerate valve seat recession. The end
result is poor valve sealing and eventual cylinder head repair or
replacement.
Heads
lacking hard seats on Corvette engines burning unleaded will have
durability better than urban legend leads many to believe. If you’ve
got old heads on a show car or weekend cruiser that sees low annual
mileage and rare high-rpm/high-load use; problems from valve seat
recession are unlikely. If the car sees high annual mileage or you
drive it hard on a regular basis, then you need to either: retrofit
hard seats to your heads, install later heads with hard seats or add
something to gasoline to inhibit valve seat recession.
There
are pour-in additives that address this problem. The Idaho
Corvette Page has test data showing Red Line Synthetic Oil
Corporation’s “Lead Substitute” is an outstanding solution to valve
seat recession. Lead Substitute uses a sodium-based chemistry which
forms sodium oxides upon combustion offering protection similar to
that of TEL. Red Line Lead Substitute comes in 12-oz. bottles, is
mixed 1-oz. per 10 gallons of fuel and should be used in every tank
of gas for best protection.
Octane
boosters–do they work?
While
a few canned, liquid, “octane boosters” can raise octane, their
practical benefits are often overstated. Common claims by these
products’ manufacturers are: they increase octane by so many
“points.” These “points” are seldom quantified, but the implication
some manufacturers hope consumers will make is: one point equals one
octane number. Sometimes these “points” are tenths of an
octane number, ten times less than what some consumers may
believe.
Manufacturers may not admit the tests supporting their performance
claims were done with 87 octane gas. Most boosters, if effective at
all, work better with regular gas than with the higher octane,
premium unleaded to which most people will add them.
The
Idaho Corvette Page
interviewed Jim Bell, who runs Kenne-Bell Performance Products, a
manufacturer of aftermarket supercharger kits. In developing blower
kits and supporting the customers who buy them, Kenne-Bell has
tested many octane boosters. “Don’t waste your time with boosters
that use alcohol because they don’t do anything,” Bell told us.
“The ones that say they have lead in them, don’t work, either,
because the amount of lead is so small. The only boosters we’ve
found to be worthwhile are those that use MMT and one we recommend
is the NOS brand.” |
MMT stands
for–try this tongue twister: methylcyclopentadienyl manganese
tricarbonyl. Once viewed as a possible replacement for TEL, while not as
potent, it still increases octane and, in large quantities, can
eliminate valve seat recession. While it’s used in Canada, MMT is
ignored by refiners in the U.S. in favor of other antidetonants, mainly
because it’s illegal in areas where RFG is required and a few refiners
feel its long-term use might compromise engine life. MMT is shunned by
car companies due to durability concerns about components in on-board
diagnostic and emissions control systems and questioned by the EPA as a
possible health hazard. Nevertheless, in 1995, MMT was allowed on the
U.S. market with some restrictions after its manufacturer won a Federal
court case against the EPA. At this writing almost no U.S. refiners add
MMT to gasoline, but it is the key ingredient in a few canned octane
boosters.
The Idaho
Corvette Page
acquired octane booster test data from an independent research
laboratory. The first test was straight 92-octane unleaded gas from a
Chevron station in southern California. It tested at 96.3 RON and 88.3
MON for an R+M/2 rating of 92.3, 0.3-oct. higher than the rating on the
pump. To a second sample of Chevron 92 from the same station, the lab
added “104 Octane Boost”. The octane of the gasoline modified with this
booster was unchanged. The lab tested a third sample of Chevron 92 and
NOS brand “Street Formula”, a MMT octane booster, mixed 1:170 (12-oz.
bottle in 16 gal. of gas). The results were: 96.8 RON, 88.4 MON and 92.6
R+M/2, a measurable change but, clearly, as the MON went up only
0.1-oct, not a practical improvement. NOS’ most potent booster, “Racing
Formula”, another MMT-based product, in Chevron 92, tested at 98.5 RON,
90.4 MON and 94.5 R+M/2, a credible but modest improvement.
Before we
get farther into testing, we should advise the reader that some of the
research for this article was done in 2001, just before a change in
premium unleaded fuel in the western United States from 92-octane to
91-octane. Some of the testing done for this article was with 92-octane
fuel, however, some additional testing and price research was done,
later, with 91-octane fuel. We apologize for the confusion but,
unfortunately, we had no control over it.
That NOS
octane booster lab-tested reasonably well intrigued us enough to give it
a practical test. We picked a 1995 ZR1. In hot weather, the ZR1’s LT5
engine, when run on premium unleaded pump gas, will detonate under high
load and, thus, will have spark retard as a result of knock sensing by
the engine computer. We demonstrated this by running the car on a Super
Flow SF-840 “Auto-Dyn, dual-mode chassis dynamometer at Westech
Performance Group in Mira Loma, California while monitoring the engine
controls data with a Vetronix Mastertech scan tester. The engine intake
air temperature (IAT) was 108 degrees F. Between peak torque and peak
power, the Mastertech showed 5-8 degrees spark retard on each of several
dyno tests.
|
The
car had 15 gallons of Chevron, premium unleaded in it when we
added one bottle of NOS “Racing Formula”, drove it 5 miles to
mix the booster thoroughly then put the car back on the Auto-Dyn.
This time, in spite of the IAT climbing to 115°F, the Mastertech
showed a maximum of two degrees retard and, on three of six
passes, it read no spark retard at all. Run #5 was the best with
power at the rear wheels up almost nine horsepower because the
gasoline’s octane was, now, just high enough to tolerate full
spark advance.
Clearly, boosters with enough MMT to be effective are good for
occasional, limited increases in octane. Applications
might be: 1) a stock, pre-’71 Corvette having a compression
ratio between 9.5:1 and 11:1, 2) a late-model C4 or C5 modified
with a low-boost, streetable supercharger kit or a “mild”
nitrous oxide injection system or, 3) a late-model car, such as
our ZR1, that experiences loss of performance on hot days when
its engine controls retard timing due to detonation.
If
you want to make pump gas into “racing gas” for engines with
11:1 or more compression, high-boost superchargers, big doses of
nitrous or any engine run on a race track at sustained
high-speed/high-load; forget it. No canned octane booster in any
quantity will fail to stop detonation under those conditions.
If
you “read” spark plugs to tune your engine, the redish-brown MMT
residue makes useful readings impossible. Levels of MMT octane
boosters just moderately beyond the recommendations of booster
manufacturers will foul spark plugs, damage oxygen sensors (O2S)
and plug catylitic converters. High percentages of MMT
contaminates engine oil and leaves hard metallic deposits in the
combustion chambers, piston tops and upper end of the cylinder
walls such that engine wear is greatly accelerated. Do not use
them in concentrations higher than suggested by their
manufacturers. |
 |
|
NOS Racing Formula should be mixed one bottle to about
16 gallons of gas. Lab testing and our dyno test showed
this product to be a useful octane booster but, in most
cases, not as economically attractive as mixes of racing
gas and pump gas. Image: author. |
|
That some
automotive manufacturers believe MMT causes problems with the second
generation on-board diagnostics (OBD 2) on ’96 or vehicles has us
concerned about long-term use of MMT boosters in OBD2 engines. We
would not use a MMT octane booster in a Corvette with OBD2. In fact,
we’re not even comfortable with long-term, regular use in any engine
with 02Ses and cats, OBD2 or otherwise.
While some
of them have a short-term practical benefit, the economics of octane
boosters aren’t much better than mixes of pump and racing gas. Factor in
the durability issue and they might not be as good a value. We priced
NOS Racing Formula on the Internet and at retail vendors. It averaged
$12.99 per bottle. At time this article was posted on the Internet,
91-oct. was going for $2.59.9@gal. at local gas stations and we
purchased "Rockett Brand 100" unleaded (106 RON, 96 MON, 100 R+M/2) for
$4.75@gal. Sixteen gallons of 91 boosted to 94.5-oct. with a bottle of
NOS ran $54.57. Sixteen gallons of 94.6 octane gas mixed 3:2, from 91
and Rockett 100 unleaded cost $55.35, seventy-eight cents more.
Considering the two mixes differ in price by a little over 1%, the
engine and emissions controls component damage you risk with MMT
boosters seems to point at racing gasoline rather than octane booster as
the sensible way to raise the octane of pump gas.
Continued - Next Page > |
|